Alvarez v. Harder Mechanical Contractors
Opinion
1 2
7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 1:23-cv-01162-BAM SERGIO ALVAREZ, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE 13 COMPLETED APPLICATION TO v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR 14 PAY FILING FEE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 15 HARDER MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, 16 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Sergio Alvarez, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on August 4, 2023, 18 along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Docs. 1, 2.) However, as there 19 are deficiencies with the IFP application, the Court will direct Plaintiff to file a new application. 20 First, Plaintiff listed “$2300.00” in response to item 2a requiring he “state the amount of 21 your take-home salary or wages and pay period and give the name and address of your 22 employer.” (Doc. 2 at 1.) Plaintiff’s response of “$2300.00” does not include the pay period for 23 this amount, nor does it include the name and address of the employer. Second, in response to 24 item 6 requiring Plaintiff “List the persons who are dependent on your for support, state your 25 relationship to each person and indicate how much you contribute to their support,” Plaintiff 26 wrote “my 3 kids and bills.” (Id. at 2.) This response does not include an amount that Plaintiff 27 contributes to his children’s support. 28 1 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), a pro se plaintiff may proceed without prepayment of fees 2 by submitting “an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such [person] possesses that the 3 person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” See Flores v. California Corr. 4 Women’s Facility, No. 1:19-cv-1509-NONE-JLT, 2020 WL 8821643, at *1 (E.D. Cal. June 24, 5 2020) (noting that § 1915(a)(1) applies to non-prisoner plaintiffs). Without knowing Plaintiff’s 6 financial circumstances, the Court cannot conclude that Plaintiff is unable to pay the $402.00 7 filing fee for this case. Accordingly, the Court will require Plaintiff to file a revised application 8 containing the completed financial information. 9 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 10 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a form IFP application. (Form 11 AO 240); 12 2. Plaintiff shall complete the form IFP application, accurately, truthfully, and 13 completely answering all questions, and shall file the form by no later than September 7, 14 2023. Alternatively, Plaintiff may pay the $402.00 filing fee to proceed with this case; 15 3. No extension of time will be granted without a showing of good cause; and 16 4. The failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action, 17 without prejudice. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED.
20 Dated: August 7, 2023 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ 21 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alvarez v. Harder Mechanical Contractors (Alvarez v. Harder Mechanical Contractors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.