Alvarez v. Alvarez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alvarez v. Alvarez

292 A.D.2d 524, 739 N.Y.S.2d 298, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2936

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 18, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 292 A.D.2d 524 (Alvarez v. Alvarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alvarez v. Alvarez, 292 A.D.2d 524, 739 N.Y.S.2d 298, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2936 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Salinitro, J.), dated October 13, 2000, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Blaustein, H.E.), dated June 23, 2000, which, after a hearing, granted his application for a downward modification of child support only to the extent of directing a downward modification retroactive to January 3, 2000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The father contends that he is entitled to a downward modification of his child support obligation retroactive to the date on which one of the parties’ children joined the armed services. However, the father may only be granted a downward modification of his child support obligation retroactive to January 3, 2000, which was the date of his application (see, Weitz v Weitz, 1 AD2d 1025).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Salinitro, J.), dated October 13, 2000, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Blaustein, H.E.), dated June 23, 2000, which, after a hearing, granted his application for a downward modification of child support only to the extent of directing a downward modification retroactive to January 3, 2000.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The father contends that he is entitled to a downward modification of his child support obligation retroactive to the date on which one of the parties’ children joined the armed services. However, the father may only be granted a downward modification of his child support obligation retroactive to January 3, 2000, which was the date of his application (see, Weitz v Weitz, 1 AD2d 1025).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, H. Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 A.D.2d 524, 739 N.Y.S.2d 298, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarez-v-alvarez-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack