Alvarez-Toro v. Gonzales

Ninth Circuit

Alvarez-Toro v. Gonzales

187 F. App'x 785

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2006·No. No. 05-76381·Published

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction is granted. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002).

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

DISMISSED.

Alvarez-Toro v. Gonzales, 187 F. App'x 785 (9th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

187 F. App'x 785 (Alvarez-Toro v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related