Alvarez-Machain v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Alvarez-Machain v. United States

284 F.3d 1039, 2002 WL 449708

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 20, 2002·No. Nos. 99-56762, 99-56880·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,¹ [1040]*1040it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,¹ [1040]*1040it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Alvarez-Machain v. United States, 284 F.3d 1039, 2002 WL 449708 (9th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

284 F.3d 1039 (Alvarez-Machain v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Humberto Alvarez-Machain v. United States of America Hector Berellez Bill Waters Pete Gruden Jack Lawn Antonio Garate-Bustamante Francisco Sosa, and Five Unnamed Mexican Nationals Currently in the Federal Witness Protection Program, Humberto Alvarez-Machain v. Francisco Sosa, and Five Unnamed Mexican Nationals Currently in the Federal Witness Protection Program

284 F.3d 1039 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)

Opinion

Related