Alvarez, Ex Parte Mario Albert

• Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 22, 2005
• Docket: AP-75,206
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-75,206 EX PARTE MARIO ALBERT ALVAREZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W01-48033-P IN THE 203RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of aggravated robbery and punishment was assessed at confinement for forty-five years. This conviction was affirmed. Alvarez v. State, No. 11-01-376-CR (Tex.App. - Eastland, delivered September 12, 2002, no pet.).

Applicant contends that he was denied an opportunity to file a petition for discretionary review because his appellate attorney did not notify him that the conviction had been affirmed or what he needed to do to file such a petition. An affidavit filed by appellate counsel states that counsel cannot find her file for Applicant and has no record any notice of the affirmance was sent to Applicant. The trial court has recommended that Applicant be granted an opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review.

Therefore, Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Wilson, 965 S.W.2d 25 (Tex.Cr.App. 1997). The proper remedy in a case such as this is to return Applicant to the point at which he can file a petition for discretionary review. He may then follow the proper procedures in order that a meaningful petition for discretionary review may be filed. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as if the Court of Appeals' decision had been rendered on the day the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that should Applicant desire to seek discretionary review, he must take affirmative steps to see that his petition is filed in the Court of Appeals within thirty days after the mandate of this Court has issued.

DELIVERED: JUNE 22, 2005

DO NOT PUBLISH