Alvarado v. State Department of Social Services

59 A.D.2d 779, 398 N.Y.S.2d 735, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13835
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 31, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 59 A.D.2d 779 (Alvarado v. State Department of Social Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alvarado v. State Department of Social Services, 59 A.D.2d 779, 398 N.Y.S.2d 735, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the State Commissioner of Social Services, dated January 15, 1976 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency to discontinue petitioner-respondent’s assistance in the category of aid to families with dependent children, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated September 1, 1976, which annulled the determination and directed the reinstatement of petitioner’s grant. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, determination of the State commissioner confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits. Petitioner is the grantee of aid to dependent children for three of her children from a former marriage supplementing support payments made by their father. The children, petitioner and her present husband reside in a house which is jointly owned by petitioner and her former husband. Petitioner’s present husband supports her and also makes the payments on the mortgage on the house; the children are not being provided with a shelter or mortgage grant. Pursuant to subdivision 1 of section 360 of the Social Services Law, the Department of Social Services requested petitioner to sign a bond and mortgage to it of her interest in the house (see, also, 18 NYCRR 369.2 [a]). The department determined to discontinue the assistance when petitioner refused to comply with this request. The discontinuance of the assistance upon petitioner’s refusal was both constitutional (see Snell v Wyman, 281 F Supp 853, affd 393 US 323; Charleston v Wohlgemuth, 332 F Supp 1175, affd 405 US 970) and proper (see Matter of Lia v Berger, 57 AD2d 838). Shapiro, J. P., Titone, Suozzi and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Etten v. Blum
79 A.D.2d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Primeau v. Toia
63 A.D.2d 814 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 A.D.2d 779, 398 N.Y.S.2d 735, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarado-v-state-department-of-social-services-nyappdiv-1977.