Alvarado v. Holder

328 F. App'x 927
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 6, 2009
Docket08-60485
StatusUnpublished

This text of 328 F. App'x 927 (Alvarado v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alvarado v. Holder, 328 F. App'x 927 (5th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Obidio A. Alvarado petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (BIA’s) summary dismissal of his appeal. Alvarado fails to address the BIA’s reasons for the summary dismissal, specifically the BIA’s conclusions that his notice of appeal failed to “meaningfully apprise the Board of the specific reasons underlying the challenge to the Immigration Judge’s decision,” that his brief was untimely, and that he failed to “reasonably explain” his failure to file a timely brief. Accordingly, any arguments relating to the BIA’s summary dismissal of his appeal are abandoned. Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir.2003).

Further, because Alvarado failed to exhaust his claims by presenting them to the BIA, we are without jurisdiction to review the claims. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1); Toledo-Hernandez v. Mukasey, 521 F.3d 332, 336 (5th Cir.2008); Townsend v. INS, 799 F.2d 179, 181-82 (5th Cir.1986) (conclusional statements in the notice of appeal did not preserve claim for the BIA’s review).

PETITION DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
328 F. App'x 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarado-v-holder-ca5-2009.