Alvarado v. De Celis

California Supreme Court

Alvarado v. De Celis

54 Cal. 588

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1880

DocketNo. 5,799

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 54 Cal. 588 (Alvarado v. De Celis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alvarado v. De Celis, 54 Cal. 588 (Cal. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Department No. 2, Thornton, J.:

In this cause the Court granted a nonsuit on motion of defendant. The plaintiffs moved for a new trial, which was granted. The appeal is from the order granting a new trial.

The Court had improperly granted a nonsuit. There was evidence admitted which should have gone to the jury, upon the issue, whether the commission sued for had been earned by the plaintiffs under their contract with defendant.

There was no error in the order appealed from, and it is affirmed.

Myrick J., and Sharpstein J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Department No. 2, Thornton, J.:

In this cause the Court granted a nonsuit on motion of defendant. The plaintiffs moved for a new trial, which was granted. The appeal is from the order granting a new trial.

The Court had improperly granted a nonsuit. There was evidence admitted which should have gone to the jury, upon the issue, whether the commission sued for had been earned by the plaintiffs under their contract with defendant.

There was no error in the order appealed from, and it is affirmed.

Myrick J., and Sharpstein J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 Cal. 588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alvarado-v-de-celis-cal-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack