Alvarado v. De Celis
54 Cal. 588
Opinion
In this cause the Court granted a nonsuit on motion of defendant. The plaintiffs moved for a new trial, which was granted. The appeal is from the order granting a new trial.
The Court had improperly granted a nonsuit. There was evidence admitted which should have gone to the jury, upon the issue, whether the commission sued for had been earned by the plaintiffs under their contract with defendant.
There was no error in the order appealed from, and it is affirmed.
Myrick J., and Sharpstein J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alvarado v. De Celis, 54 Cal. 588 (Cal. 1880).
54 Cal. 588 (Alvarado v. De Celis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boise Motor Car Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.
112 P.2d 1011 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1941)
Goldstone v. Merchants' Ice & Cold Storage Co.
56 P. 776 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Bygum v. Southern Pac. Co.
36 P. 415 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
Franklin v. Southern California Motor Road Co.
24 P. 723 (California Supreme Court, 1890)