Alvarado v. Commissioner of Correction

152 A.3d 86, 169 Conn. App. 706, 2016 Conn. App. LEXIS 456
Connecticut Appellate Court·Decided December 13, 2016·No. AC38005·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Angel Alvarado, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he challenged his disciplinary designation as a member of a security risk group by the respondent, the Commissioner of Correction. The habeas court dismissed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Practice Book § 23-29 (2) on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted. Because a "petitioner's classification as a security risk group member does not implicate a liberty interest" that is "sufficient to invoke the subject matter jurisdiction of the habeas court"; (internal quotation marks omitted) Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Correction , 159 Conn.App. 162 , 166, 122 A.3d 709 (2015) ; we conclude that the habeas court properly dismissed the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On this point, jurists of reason cannot differ. Accordingly, we further conclude that the habeas court did not err in denying the petitioner's petition for certification to appeal. See id.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvarado v. Commissioner of Correction, 152 A.3d 86, 169 Conn. App. 706, 2016 Conn. App. LEXIS 456 (Colo. Ct. App. 2016).

152 A.3d 86 (Alvarado v. Commissioner of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reese v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2017
Reese v. Comm'r of Corr.
160 A.3d 410 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2017)