Alvarado v. 1824 Weeks Ave. Equities, Inc.

305 A.D.2d 118, 757 N.Y.S.2d 743, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4610
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 1, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered October 29, 2001, which denied plaintiff’s motion to vacate dismissal of this action and restore it to the calendar, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Vacatur of the dismissal of this action, which dismissal was ordered pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.27, was properly denied since plaintiff did not meet his burden as movant to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear at calendar call (see Polir Constr. v Etingin, 297 AD2d 509, 511-512 [2002]). It was the obligation of plaintiff’s attorney to apprise her adversary of her current address, and not the adversary’s responsibility to search for her.

We have considered plaintiff’s other contentions and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alvarado v. 1824 Weeks Ave. Equities, Inc., 305 A.D.2d 118, 757 N.Y.S.2d 743, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

305 A.D.2d 118 (Alvarado v. 1824 Weeks Ave. Equities, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pizarro v. Evergreen Estates Housing
5 A.D.3d 143 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)