Alva v. State
This text of 799 S.W.2d 765 (Alva v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The trial court revoked appellant’s probation and assessed punishment at confinement for eight years for the offense of theft. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Alva v. State, 797 S.W.2d 957 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th] 1990).
Appellant raises one ground for review concerning the sufficiency of the evidence to support the revocation of probation. After careful review we refuse appellant’s petition for review. However, as is true in every case where discretionary review is refused, this refusal does not constitute endorsement or adoption of the reasoning employed by the Court of Appeals. Sheffield v. State, 650 S.W.2d 813 (Tex.Cr.App.1983). With this understanding, we refuse appellant’s petition for discretionary review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
799 S.W.2d 765, 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 193, 1990 WL 182414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alva-v-state-texcrimapp-1990.