Aluzzo v. Sorallo
This text of 263 A.D. 1066 (Aluzzo v. Sorallo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. For a proper form of verdict see rule 241 of the Rules of Civil Practice. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action in ejectment.) Present -— Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 A.D. 1066, 34 N.Y.S.2d 828, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aluzzo-v-sorallo-nyappdiv-1942.