Aluvale v. Truland Systems Corp.

555 F. App'x 250
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 20, 2014·No. No. 13-2029·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Aluvale appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant on Aluvale’s claim of discriminatory discharge under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp.2013). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by [251] the district court. Aluvale v. Truland Sys. Corp., No. 1:13-cv-00178-AJT-TRJ (E.D. Va. Aug. 16, 2013); see Summ. J. Tr. 12-18, Aug. 16, 2013. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aluvale v. Truland Systems Corp., 555 F. App'x 250 (4th Cir. 2014).

555 F. App'x 250 (Aluvale v. Truland Systems Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e