Alusma v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Alusma v. State

840 So. 2d 342, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1842, 2003 WL 355429

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 19, 2003

DocketNo. 4D02-4091

StatusPublished

This text of 840 So. 2d 342 (Alusma v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alusma v. State, 840 So. 2d 342, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1842, 2003 WL 355429 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235, 236 (Fla.1996), we are compelled to reverse the order denying post-conviction relief as to appellant’s claim that his plea was involuntary because it was based on the misadvice of counsel. We affirm the order insofar as it denies relief based on appellant’s double jeopardy claim. We remand for an evidentiary hearing or the attachment of records that conclusively refute appellant’s claim.

KLEIN, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based on State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235, 236 (Fla.1996), we are compelled to reverse the order denying post-conviction relief as to appellant’s claim that his plea was involuntary because it was based on the misadvice of counsel. We affirm the order insofar as it denies relief based on appellant’s double jeopardy claim. We remand for an evidentiary hearing or the attachment of records that conclusively refute appellant’s claim.

KLEIN, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

840 So. 2d 342, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1842, 2003 WL 355429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alusma-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack