Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co. v. United States

90 Ct. Cl. 187, 1940 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 133, 1940 WL 4048
United States Court of Claims·Decided January 8, 1940·No. No. 42621·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Williams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The facts are fully disclosed and set out in our Findings and need not be restated. The defendant concedes that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the principal sum claimed in suit, $842.18.

It was determined in Aluminum Company of America v. United States, 87 C. Cls. 96, that that company was not indebted to the United States in the amount pleaded in a counterclaim therein, or in any amount whatever, but that the United States on the contrary was indebted to the plaintiff therein, the Aluminum Company of America. Therefore the withholding of the amounts admittedly due plaintiff in this case to offset the nonexisting but alleged indebtedness of the Aluminum Company of America to th& defendant was wrongful and entitles the plaintiff, under the provisions of the act of March 3, 1875, as amended by the act of March 3, 1933 (47 Stat. 1489), to interest at the' rate of 6 percent from the date of such wrongful withholding to March 3, 1933, which has been stipulated by the-parties to be $232.19.

Plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover the sum of $1,074.37 and judgment in that amount is hereby awarded. It is so ordered.

Littleton, Judge; Gkeen, Judge; and Whaley, Chief Justice, concur. Whitaker, Judge, took no part in the decision of this, case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co. v. United States, 90 Ct. Cl. 187, 1940 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 133, 1940 WL 4048 (cc 1940).

90 Ct. Cl. 187 (Aluminum Cooking Utensil Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doko Farms v. United States
21 Cl. Ct. 696 (Court of Claims, 1990)