Aluminum Co. of America v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Aluminum Co. of America v. United States

28 Cust. Ct. 407, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 256

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 25, 1952

DocketNo. 56416; protest 152274-K (Norfolk)

StatusPublished

This text of 28 Cust. Ct. 407 (Aluminum Co. of America v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aluminum Co. of America v. United States, 28 Cust. Ct. 407, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 256 (cusc 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the hearing it was agreed between the parties that the merchandise consists of articles of which metal is the component material of chief value, other than ores or concentrates or crude metal. Uncontradicted evidence was introduced to the effect that the articles were imported to be used in remanufacture by melting and that they have been used in remanufacture by melting. An examination of the papers disclosed that affidavits had been [408]*408filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, supra. Upon the record presented, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the hearing it was agreed between the parties that the merchandise consists of articles of which metal is the component material of chief value, other than ores or concentrates or crude metal. Uncontradicted evidence was introduced to the effect that the articles were imported to be used in remanufacture by melting and that they have been used in remanufacture by melting. An examination of the papers disclosed that affidavits had been [408]*408filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, supra. Upon the record presented, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 Cust. Ct. 407, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aluminum-co-of-america-v-united-states-cusc-1952.