ALUMAX FOILS, INC. v. Daly

157 S.W.3d 236, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1901, 2004 WL 2852947
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 14, 2004·No. ED 84365·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Steven Russell Ohmer, Judge.

Alumax Foils, Inc. appeals from the trial court’s judgment affirming the Missouri State Tax Commission’s dismissal of Alu-max’s appeal of Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly’s, License Collector for the City of St. Louis, assessment of Alumax’s tangible personal property for the 2002 tax year. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. No precedential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ALUMAX FOILS, INC. v. Daly, 157 S.W.3d 236, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1901, 2004 WL 2852947 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

157 S.W.3d 236 (ALUMAX FOILS, INC. v. Daly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Care & Treatment of Jones v. State
157 S.W.3d 236 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004)