ALUMAX FOILS, INC. v. Daly

Missouri Court of Appeals

ALUMAX FOILS, INC. v. Daly

157 S.W.3d 236, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1901, 2004 WL 2852947

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 14, 2004

DocketED 84365

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 S.W.3d 236 (ALUMAX FOILS, INC. v. Daly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ALUMAX FOILS, INC. v. Daly, 157 S.W.3d 236, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1901, 2004 WL 2852947 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Steven Russell Ohmer, Judge.

Alumax Foils, Inc. appeals from the trial court’s judgment affirming the Missouri State Tax Commission’s dismissal of Alu-max’s appeal of Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly’s, License Collector for the City of St. Louis, assessment of Alumax’s tangible personal property for the 2002 tax year. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. No precedential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis; Steven Russell Ohmer, Judge.

Alumax Foils, Inc. appeals from the trial court’s judgment affirming the Missouri State Tax Commission’s dismissal of Alu-max’s appeal of Defendant Gregory F.X. Daly’s, License Collector for the City of St. Louis, assessment of Alumax’s tangible personal property for the 2002 tax year. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. No precedential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 S.W.3d 236, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1901, 2004 WL 2852947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alumax-foils-inc-v-daly-moctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack