Aluisio v. Swisher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aluisio v. Swisher

5 A.D.2d 844, 171 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6939

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 844 (Aluisio v. Swisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aluisio v. Swisher, 5 A.D.2d 844, 171 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by a property owner for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that certain amendments to a zoning ordinance are unconstitutional, void and ineffective insofar as they place his property in an “A” residence district, wherein no building shall be erected or altered on a lot of an area less than one acre. Prior thereto, said property was in a “C” residence district, wherein no building may be erected or altered on a lot of an area less than 10,000 square feet. The appeal is from an order granting summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by a property owner for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that certain amendments to a zoning ordinance are unconstitutional, void and ineffective insofar as they place his property in an “A” residence district, wherein no building shall be erected or altered on a lot of an area less than one acre. Prior thereto, said property was in a “C” residence district, wherein no building may be erected or altered on a lot of an area less than 10,000 square feet. The appeal is from an order granting summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 844, 171 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aluisio-v-swisher-nyappdiv-1958.