Altus Alfalfa Milling Co. v. Tappan

1911 OK 346, 119 P. 204, 29 Okla. 736, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 376
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 14, 1911·No. 2592·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*737 KANE, J.

This cause comes on tó be heard upón'.a motion to dismiss, upon the ground that the petition in error and case-made were not filed in this court within the time required by law.

The motion must be sustained. The record shows that on the 12th day of May, 1910, a motion for a new trial was overruled, and the plaintiff in error was granted 90 days within which to prepare and serve a case-made; that 10 days were given the defendant in error within which to suggest amendments, and said case to be settled upon 5 days’ notice; that on the 11th day of August, 1910, counsel for plaintiff in error served his case-made. The case was served one day out of time. It is well settled that under such circumstances the appeal must be dismissed.

It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Altus Alfalfa Milling Co. v. Tappan, 1911 OK 346, 119 P. 204, 29 Okla. 736, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 376 (Okla. 1911).

1911 OK 346 (Altus Alfalfa Milling Co. v. Tappan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harvey v. Benmo Oil Co.
272 F. 475 (E.D. Oklahoma, 1921)