Altum v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Missouri

Altum v. Arnold

27 Mo. 264

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedJuly 15, 1858

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 27 Mo. 264 (Altum v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Altum v. Arnold, 27 Mo. 264 (Mo. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Richardson, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was commenced since the revised statutes of 1855 took effect, and was tried by the court without instructions, and without raising any questions of law during the progress of the trial. Therefore, according to the settled practice of this court, which has been established by a series of decisions and recognized in several cases at the present term, the judgment must be affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Richardson, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was commenced since the revised statutes of 1855 took effect, and was tried by the court without instructions, and without raising any questions of law during the progress of the trial. Therefore, according to the settled practice of this court, which has been established by a series of decisions and recognized in several cases at the present term, the judgment must be affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Mo. 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/altum-v-arnold-mo-1858.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack