Altum v. Arnold

27 Mo. 264
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided July 15, 1858·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Richardson, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was commenced since the revised statutes of 1855 took effect, and was tried by the court without instructions, and without raising any questions of law during the progress of the trial. Therefore, according to the settled practice of this court, which has been established by a series of decisions and recognized in several cases at the present term, the judgment must be affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Altum v. Arnold, 27 Mo. 264 (Mo. 1858).

27 Mo. 264 (Altum v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meridian Lumber Co. v. Lowry Lumber Co.
229 S.W. 267 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1921)
Zimmerman v. Chicago, Great Western Railway Co.
57 S.W. 718 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)
Wischmeyer v. Richardson
55 S.W. 74 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)
Rice, Stix & Co. v. McClure & Harper
74 Mo. App. 383 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1898)
Riffe v. Wabash Railroad
72 Mo. App. 222 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1897)
Bethune v. Cleveland, St. Louis & Kansas City Railway Co.
41 S.W. 213 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
DeGiverville v. Legg
48 Mo. App. 573 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
Mead v. Spalding
94 Mo. 43 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1887)
Tyler v. Larimore
19 Mo. App. 445 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)
Ford v. City of Cameron
19 Mo. App. 467 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885)
Miller v. Breneke
83 Mo. 163 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)
Cunningham v. Snow
82 Mo. 587 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)