Alto v. State ex rel. State Fire Marshal

865 P.2d 1328, 125 Or. App. 584, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 2254
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alto v. State ex rel. State Fire Marshal. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 Or. App. 543
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided December 29, 1993·No. 9009-05766; CA A67834·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiffs petition for an award of attorney fees and costs on appeal against defendant. In Alto v. State Fire Marshal, 121 Or App 543, 553, 855 P2d 649, rev den 318 Or 97 (1993), we reversed the trial court’s order denying attorney fees and costs because plaintiffs had a right under ORCP 68C(4)(a) to file a statement and make a record of the facts required to justify a fee award. We said:

“We decline to address the parties’ conflicting arguments about plaintiffs’ right to fees until they have been addressed by the trial court.” 121 Or App at 553. (Footnote omitted.)

Plaintiffs’ petition asks us to decide whether they are entitled to fees on appeal. We decline to decide the question until the trial court decides their entitlement to fees on remand. We note that “attorney fees,” within the meaning of ORCP 68A(1), may include fees incurred on appeal.

Defendant does not object to the statement of costs and disbursements. We allow costs and disbursements in the amount claimed, $865.80. ORAP 13.05(5)(d).

Petition for attorney fees denied; costs and disbursements allowed in the sum of $865.80.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alto v. State ex rel. State Fire Marshal, 865 P.2d 1328, 125 Or. App. 584, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 2254 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).

865 P.2d 1328 (Alto v. State ex rel. State Fire Marshal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alto v. State Ex Rel. State Fire Marshal
855 P.2d 649 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)