Alto Company, a Partnership v. Fish Manufacturing Co., Inc.

252 F.2d 299, 116 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 306
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 20, 1958·No. 12286·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record in this case with care and have scrutinized and weighed all of the contentions of the parties. The findings of the court below are adequate and the issues of law were decided correctly. The conclusions reached by the court below that Schmidt was the first and original inventor of the invention covered by the claims of Patent No. 2,669,269, that Schmidt and Shaffer were jointly the first and original inventors of the invention covered by the claim of Patent No. 2,753,907, that Alto Company is the owner of the patents, that Fish Manufacturing Co., Inc. infringed them, and that Alto was not guilty of unfair competition, find full support in the record. The assertion of Fish that the patents were procured by fraud is without merit. The judgment will be affirmed on the opinion of Chief Judge Forman, D.C., 158 F.Supp. 752.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alto Company, a Partnership v. Fish Manufacturing Co., Inc., 252 F.2d 299, 116 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 306 (3d Cir. 1958).

252 F.2d 299 (Alto Company, a Partnership v. Fish Manufacturing Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alto Co. v. Fish Manufacturing Co.
158 F. Supp. 752 (D. New Jersey, 1957)