Altmark v. Gelfand

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Altmark v. Gelfand

133 N.Y.S. 443

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1912

StatusPublished

This text of 133 N.Y.S. 443 (Altmark v. Gelfand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Altmark v. Gelfand, 133 N.Y.S. 443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs brought an action for replevin. The answer sets up as a defense and counterclaim that the defendant had a lien upon the goods in suit for services rendered in manufacturing the goods to the amount of $352.58, and asked that the com[444]*444plaint be dismissed, with costs, and that the defendant have judgment upon his counterclaim.

[1, 2] The trial justice gave judgment for the defendant for the sum of $352.58, with interest, but failed to give a judgment for either party_ awarding possession of the goods. All the issues raised by the pleadings and the proof should be decided at the trial, and while the appellate court may review the findings and judgment of the court below, it cannot try the issues anew. Bellock v. Weitzer, 144 App. Div. 292, 129 N. Y. Supp. 178.

The judgment must therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event, unless the defendant will stipulate that the judgment be modified, by deducting the costs and providing that the possession of the goods be awarded to the plaintiffs, in which case the judgment will be affirmed, as modified, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs brought an action for replevin. The answer sets up as a defense and counterclaim that the defendant had a lien upon the goods in suit for services rendered in manufacturing the goods to the amount of $352.58, and asked that the com[444]*444plaint be dismissed, with costs, and that the defendant have judgment upon his counterclaim.

[1, 2] The trial justice gave judgment for the defendant for the sum of $352.58, with interest, but failed to give a judgment for either party_ awarding possession of the goods. All the issues raised by the pleadings and the proof should be decided at the trial, and while the appellate court may review the findings and judgment of the court below, it cannot try the issues anew. Bellock v. Weitzer, 144 App. Div. 292, 129 N. Y. Supp. 178.

The judgment must therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event, unless the defendant will stipulate that the judgment be modified, by deducting the costs and providing that the possession of the goods be awarded to the plaintiffs, in which case the judgment will be affirmed, as modified, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 N.Y.S. 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/altmark-v-gelfand-nyappterm-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack