Altman v. Stichman

31 A.D.2d 741, 296 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4707
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 31 A.D.2d 741 (Altman v. Stichman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Altman v. Stichman, 31 A.D.2d 741, 296 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4707 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Order, entered July 11,1968, unanimously reversed, on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellant, and plaintiff’s motion to open his default and restore the action to the calendar is denied, with costs. Plaintiff has failed to show either an acceptable excuse for his default or a meritorious cause of action to justify the vacatur of the dismissal of his complaint. This personal injury action was dismissed upon plaintiff’s failure to appear at a calendar call of nonpreferred cases on April 17, 1967. Neither the inadvertence of plaintiff’s attorney’s office in not discovering the call nor the failure of a calendar watch service to notify such attorney of the call constitutes an adequate excuse for plaintiff’s failure to appear. (See Tepperman v. Peri, 29 A D 2d 893, app. dsmd. 22 N Y 2d 703; Filippi v. Grand Union Co., 30 A D 2d 532; Sortino v. [742]*742Fisher, 20 A D 2d 25, 29.) Plaintiff’s affidavit of merits is also insufficient since it fails to factually show that plaintiff has a meritorious cause of action. (See Keogh v. New York Post Corp., 22 A D 2d 659; Maggio v. Columbia Operating Co., 28 A D 2d 529; Sortino v. Fisher, supra, p. 32.) Finally, plaintiff’s delay of over a year in making this motion is not without significance in the determination of the motion. (See Back v. Stern, 23 A D 2d 837.) Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Silverstein v. Hobbyland Marine, Inc.
122 Misc. 2d 1013 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
Ross v. Sanck
54 A.D.2d 610 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.D.2d 741, 296 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/altman-v-stichman-nyappdiv-1969.