Altman v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services

580 So. 2d 905, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6480, 1991 WL 110856
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 1991·No. No. 91-0783·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We reject appellant’s contention that the appellee’s emergency order is deficient on its face. Our affirmance is, of course, without prejudice to the appellant’s right to challenge the appellee’s pending administrative complaint in an appropriate administrative hearing or any subsequent review thereof.

ANSTEAD and WARNER, JJ., and STEVENSON, W. MATTHEW, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Altman v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 580 So. 2d 905, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6480, 1991 WL 110856 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

580 So. 2d 905 (Altman v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. Singletary
580 So. 2d 905 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)