Altman v. Poughkeepsie Savings Bank
This text of 72 A.D.2d 552 (Altman v. Poughkeepsie Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover a deposit paid under a contract to purchase real property, the defendant seller appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated December 22, 1978, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. The affidavits at Special Term raise an issue of fact as to whether plaintiff’s efforts to obtain a mortgage loan had been sufficient to constitute due diligence (see Jered Contr. Corp. v New York City Tr. Auth., 22 NY2d 187; Johnson v Werner, 63 AD2d 422). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 A.D.2d 552, 420 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/altman-v-poughkeepsie-savings-bank-nyappdiv-1979.