Altman v. McCall

35 Misc. 790, 72 N.Y.S. 1094

This text of 35 Misc. 790 (Altman v. McCall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Altman v. McCall, 35 Misc. 790, 72 N.Y.S. 1094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant received no title to the merchandise under the insolvent assignment, because his assignors had no title thereto, it appearing that the goods were delivered to them on memorandum. Thé defendant, when he refused to surrender possession to the true owners, became liable individually, after demand was made. No exception is presented which affects the original disposition' made of the case.

Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Misc. 790, 72 N.Y.S. 1094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/altman-v-mccall-nyappterm-1901.