Altman v. Graham
22 Minn. 531, 1876 Minn. LEXIS 47
Opinion
. There is evidence in the case from which a jury might find either that there was or was not a contract to work for a specific time, and the finding of the court below on the fact cannot be disturbed.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Altman v. Graham, 22 Minn. 531, 1876 Minn. LEXIS 47 (Mich. 1876).
22 Minn. 531 (Altman v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. Jones
103 N.W. 1017 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1905)