Altizer v. Town of Cedar Bluff Virginia

621 F. App'x 248
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 5, 2015
DocketNo. 15-1514
StatusPublished

This text of 621 F. App'x 248 (Altizer v. Town of Cedar Bluff Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Altizer v. Town of Cedar Bluff Virginia, 621 F. App'x 248 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marilyn Altizer appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the claims raised in the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Altizer v. Town of Cedar Bluff Va., No. 1:14-cv-00007-JPJ-PMS, — F.Supp.3d -, 2015 WL 1754679 (W.D.Va. Apr. 17, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Altizer v. Town of Cedar Bluff
104 F. Supp. 3d 760 (W.D. Virginia, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
621 F. App'x 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/altizer-v-town-of-cedar-bluff-virginia-ca4-2015.