Altieri v. Monaco

33 Misc. 763, 67 N.Y.S. 854
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Misc. 763 (Altieri v. Monaco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Altieri v. Monaco, 33 Misc. 763, 67 N.Y.S. 854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant admitted upon the trial that he received the draft in question; that he cashed the same, and that he failed to pay the proceeds thereof to the plaintiff, but claimed that the latter had purchased goods from him to the amount of sixty dollars, which he had not paid, and for which the defendant set up a counterclaim.

The plaintiff denied that he purchased any goods from the [764]*764defendant and the justice resolved the conflict of testimony in his favor.

We do not think the finding is against the weight of evidence, nor do we perceive any reason for reversing the judgment, since no exception was taken by the appellant upon the trial.

Present: Beeicmah, P. J., Giegebich- and O’Gobmah, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Misc. 763, 67 N.Y.S. 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/altieri-v-monaco-nyappterm-1900.