Altheide v. State of Nevada
This text of Altheide v. State of Nevada (Altheide v. State of Nevada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 JASON ARTHUR ALTHEIDE, Case No.: 2:19-cv-02245-JAD-BNW
4 Petitioner Order Granting Motion 5 v. for Court-Appointed Counsel and Denying Other Motions 6 STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
7 Respondents ECF Nos. 16, 27, 29, 30, 31
8 9 Pro se petitioner Jason Altheide moves the court to appoint an attorney to represent him 10 in this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas case.1 There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel for a 11 federal habeas corpus proceeding,2 but the court must appoint an attorney if (1) a case is so 12 complex denying counsel would deny due process or (2) the petitioner’s education is so limited 13 that he is incapable of fairly presenting his claims.3 Although it is currently unclear whether 14 some of the legal issues Altheide wishes to raise are complex, he is serving a life sentence 15 without the possibility of parole. Respondents also state that Altheide has a fourth state 16 postconviction habeas corpus petition pending.4 Therefore, to ensure due process, I find that this 17 case is sufficiently complex and I grant Altheide’s motion for counsel. 18 19
20 1 ECF No. 31. 21 2 Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Bonin v. Vasquez, 999 F.2d 425, 428 (9th Cir. 1993). 22 3 Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1023 (1987); Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 838 (1984); Hawkins v. 23 Bennett, 423 F.2d 948 (8th Cir. 1970). 4 See Nevada Supreme Court Case No. 80733. 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel 2|| [ECF No. 31] is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) is appointed to represent petitioner. Once counsel has entered an appearance in this case, the court will issue a scheduling order that will, among other things, set a deadline for counsel to file an amended petition. 6 The Clerk of Court is directed to ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the FPD a copy of this order and the petition for writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 4]. The FPD has 30 days from the date 8|| of entry of this order to file a notice of appearance or to indicate to the court its inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings. 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ motion to dismiss [ECF No. 16] is 11] DENIED without prejudice. 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s motions of notice re: re-filing, to 13] supplement, and to dismiss unexhausted aspects of original petition [ECF Nos. 27, 29, 30] are 14! all DENIED as moot. 15 Dated: August 31, 2020 — Jennifer A~Porsey 17 United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Altheide v. State of Nevada, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/altheide-v-state-of-nevada-nvd-2020.