Altheide v. Dzurenda

• Court: District Court, D. Nevada
• Decided: June 19, 2020
• Docket: 3:18-cv-00408
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

Attorney General 2 PETER E. DUNKLEY, Bar No. 11110 Deputy Attorney General 3 State of Nevada Public Safety Division 4 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701-4717 5 Tel: (775) 684-1259 E-mail: pdunkley@ag.nv.gov 6 Attorneys for Defendants 7 George Davis, William Gittere, Dennis Homan, William Moore, 8 William Reubart, Daniel Schmidt, And Harold Wickham 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 JASON ALTHEIDE, Case No. 3:18-cv-00408-MMD-CLB 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION 15 WILLIAM MOORE, et al., (FIRST REQUEST) 16 Defendants. 17 Defendants, George Davis, William Gittere, Dennis Homan, William Moore, William 18 Reubart, Daniel Schmidt, and Harold Wickham, by and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, 19 Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Peter E. Dunkley, Deputy Attorney General, 20 hereby request an extension of 49 days, until August 7, 2020, to file a dispositive motion. 21 MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 In light of the administrative obstacles at the Office of the Attorney General 24 (OAG), related to the response to COVID-19, which has affected the responsiveness of 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 2 request the extension. An additional side effect of the Nevada’s and the OAG’s administrative 3 COVID-19 safeguards is that deadlines in some cases have become piled up, resulting in 4 multiple deadlines for dispositive motions falling on a single day.1 5 Thus, Defendants respectfully requests a forty nine (49) day extension of time from the 6 current deadline of June 19, 2020, to file a dispositive motion on or before August 7, 2020. 7 II. DISCUSSION 8 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) governs extensions of time and provides as 9 follows: 10 When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time: (A) with or without motion or 11 notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its extension expires; or (B) on motion made after the time 12 has expired if the party failed to act because of excusable neglect. 13 “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of 14 litigation….” Zivkovic v. S. California Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002) (citation 15 omitted). 16 Defendants asserts that the requisite good cause is present to warrant the requested 17 extension of time. Defendants make the instant request in light of the current issues related 18 to COVID-19 including Nevada Governor Sisolak’s March 31, 2020 Declaration of Emergency 19 (Directive 010) – ‘Stay at Home Order’ and the Governor’s April 1, 2020 “Stay at Home” 20 directive. In response, the Office of the Attorney General (“OAG”) has directed all AOG 21 employees to comply with the Governor’s orders, limit in-office work and to stay at home 22 effective immediately while and until the OAG transitions to alternate, home-based working 23 arrangements. In light of those directives, and due to the difficulties the instant 24 circumstances place on obtaining the necessary supporting documents, including 25 correspondence between the OAG and certain Defendants, and the “stacked” litigation 26 1 June 19, 2020 is one such day, with dispositive motions being due in this case, 27 and in 3:19-cv-00084 (extension also requested), and in a state court case in the eighth judicial district, A-20-814296-C (finalizing and filing today). The Ninth Circuit’s COVID- 28 19 Notice (as of 3/26/20) implies 60 days may be sufficient for brief filing extensions. 1 || deadlines. Defendants respectfully request that the Court extend the dispositive motion 2 || deadline by 49 days, until August 7, 2020. Defendants’ request will not hinder or prejudice 3 || Plaintiff's case, who has already filed a dispositive motion. 4 CONCLUSION 5 For these reasons, Defendants respectfully requests a forty-nine (49) day extension to 6 || the current dispositive motion deadline. 7 Proposed Schedule for Dispositive Deadline 8 Current Dispositive Motion Deadline June 19, 2020 9 Proposed Dispositive Motion Deadline August 7, 2020 10 DATED this 19th day of June 2020. 11 AARON D. FORD Attorney General

13 By: /s/ Peter E. Dunkley PETER E. DUNKLEY, Bar No. 11110 14 Deputy Attorney General 15 Attorneys for Defendants 16 17 18 || ISSO. ORDERED: 19 ‘

20 || UNITED STK TES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 DATED: June 19, 2020 23 24 25 26 27 28

2 I certify that I am an employee of the Office of the Attorney General, State of Nevada, 3 and that on this 19th day of June, 2020, I caused a copy of the foregoing, MOTION FOR 4 EXTENSION OF TIME FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION (FIRST REQUEST), to be 5 served, by U.S. District Court CM/ECF Electronic Filing on the following: 6 Jason Altheide, #1169889 7 C/O Law Librarian High Desert State Prison 8 22010 Cold Creek Road P.O Box 650 9 Indian Springs, NV 89070 HDSP_lawlibrary@doc.nv.gov 10 11 /s/ Caitie Collins _____________ 12 An employee of the Office of the Attorney General 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28