Alters v. H.W. Henderson Construction Co.

489 So. 2d 840, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1264, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8194
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 4, 1986·No. No. BI-200·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BARFIELD, Judge.

The trial court dismissed appellants’ nine-count second amended complaint against Henderson Construction, Watson Realty and Campbell. Eight of those counts fail to state a legal cause of action and violate the pleading rules of the Rules of Civil Procedure. Count I does manage to recite the elements of a breach of contract cause of action. However, that count also violates Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.110(b). Appellants’ counsel foreclosed his opportunity to further amend this complaint by requesting a dismissal with prejudice, if the court dismissed the complaint.

Accordingly, the order dismissing all counts of the complaint is AFFIRMED.

SHIVERS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alters v. H.W. Henderson Construction Co., 489 So. 2d 840, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1264, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8194 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

489 So. 2d 840 (Alters v. H.W. Henderson Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JOSE MEJIA v. SCOTT EGLESTON
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021