Alterman v. Noe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alterman v. Noe

22 A.D.2d 928, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2435

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 928 (Alterman v. Noe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alterman v. Noe, 22 A.D.2d 928, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2435 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law, to direct the recanvass and the recount of the votes for the office of Assemblyman in the Third Assembly District of Westchester County, which were cast in the general election held November 3, 1964, the petitioner Arthur Alterman, who is the Democratic and Liberal candidate for said office, and the respondent George E. Van Cott, who is the Republican candidate for said office, each cross-appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered December 17, 1964 upon the court’s decision and opinion after a hearing, as is adverse to him. Order, insofar as appealed from by the respective parties, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under section 330 of the Election Law, to direct the recanvass and the recount of the votes for the office of Assemblyman in the Third Assembly District of Westchester County, which were cast in the general election held November 3, 1964, the petitioner Arthur Alterman, who is the Democratic and Liberal candidate for said office, and the respondent George E. Van Cott, who is the Republican candidate for said office, each cross-appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered December 17, 1964 upon the court’s decision and opinion after a hearing, as is adverse to him. Order, insofar as appealed from by the respective parties, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 928, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alterman-v-noe-nyappdiv-1964.