Alterman v. Maimonides Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alterman v. Maimonides Hospital

25 A.D.2d 863, 270 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4237

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 863 (Alterman v. Maimonides Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alterman v. Maimonides Hospital, 25 A.D.2d 863, 270 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4237 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In an aetion [864]*864to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering allegedly caused by medical malpractice, three of the individual defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 23, 1966, which granted plaintiff’s motion for a continuation of their examinations before trial and to direct them to give answers to certain questions previously propounded calling for expert or opinion testimony. Defendant Gross, by his notice of- appeal purports to appeal from the court’s decision only. Appeal dismissed, without costs (see decision on motion Alterman v. Maimonides Hosp., 25 A D 2d 864). Further, as to defendant Gross, no appeal lies from a decision.

Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an aetion [864]*864to recover damages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering allegedly caused by medical malpractice, three of the individual defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered March 23, 1966, which granted plaintiff’s motion for a continuation of their examinations before trial and to direct them to give answers to certain questions previously propounded calling for expert or opinion testimony. Defendant Gross, by his notice of- appeal purports to appeal from the court’s decision only. Appeal dismissed, without costs (see decision on motion Alterman v. Maimonides Hosp., 25 A D 2d 864). Further, as to defendant Gross, no appeal lies from a decision.

Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 863, 270 N.Y.S.2d 135, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alterman-v-maimonides-hospital-nyappdiv-1966.