Alterman Transport Lines, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Tenn.

Supreme Court

Alterman Transport Lines, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Tenn.

386 U.S. 262

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 13, 1967·No. 942·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

386 U.S. 262 (1967)

ALTERMAN TRANSPORT LINES, INC., ET AL.
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF TENNESSEE ET AL.

No. 942.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 13, 1967. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE.

J. G. Lackey, Jr., for appellants.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, Milton P. Rice, Assistant Attorney General, and Seymour Samuels, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

386 U.S. 262 (1967)

ALTERMAN TRANSPORT LINES, INC., ET AL.
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF TENNESSEE ET AL.

No. 942.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 13, 1967. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE.

J. G. Lackey, Jr., for appellants.

George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, Milton P. Rice, Assistant Attorney General, and Seymour Samuels, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE STEWART is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Alterman Transport Lines, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Tenn., 386 U.S. 262 (1967).

Pincite

386 U.S. 262 (Alterman Transport Lines, Inc. v. Public Serv. Comm'n of Tenn.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

ALTERMAN TRANSPORT LINES, INC., ET AL. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF TENNESSEE ET AL.

J. G. Lackey, Jr., for appellants.

Related

ALTERMAN TRANSPORT LINES, INC., ET AL.
v.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF TENNESSEE ET AL.