Alter v. Altman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alter v. Altman

36 A.D.2d 948, 321 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4162

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 36 A.D.2d 948 (Alter v. Altman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alter v. Altman, 36 A.D.2d 948, 321 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4162 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Ho opinion. Munder, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Martuscello, J., dissents in part and votes to annul so much of the determination as granted an increase in garage rentals, with the following memorandum: I find it unfair that the result of this determination permits the landlord to charge tenants $46 a month for garage space and non-tenants $40. Such an inconsistency should not be permitted. The solution is to permit garage rental increases to be granted only by the Bureau of Consumer Affairs rather than by the Commissioner of the Department of Rent and Housing Maintenance, as in the case at bar. Such procedure would prevent the inequity which arose in the case at bar.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ho opinion. Munder, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Martuscello, J., dissents in part and votes to annul so much of the determination as granted an increase in garage rentals, with the following memorandum: I find it unfair that the result of this determination permits the landlord to charge tenants $46 a month for garage space and non-tenants $40. Such an inconsistency should not be permitted. The solution is to permit garage rental increases to be granted only by the Bureau of Consumer Affairs rather than by the Commissioner of the Department of Rent and Housing Maintenance, as in the case at bar. Such procedure would prevent the inequity which arose in the case at bar.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 A.D.2d 948, 321 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alter-v-altman-nyappdiv-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack