Altamura v. OneBeacon Insurance Group
This text of 68 A.D.3d 792 (Altamura v. OneBeacon Insurance Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Since the plaintiff failed to meet her prima facie burden, we need not consider the sufficiency of the defendant’s opposition papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of serious injury. Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 A.D.3d 792, 889 N.Y.2d 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/altamura-v-onebeacon-insurance-group-nyappdiv-2009.