Altamura v. OneBeacon Insurance Group

68 A.D.3d 792, 889 N.Y.2d 472
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 A.D.3d 792 (Altamura v. OneBeacon Insurance Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Altamura v. OneBeacon Insurance Group, 68 A.D.3d 792, 889 N.Y.2d 472 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

The plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Since the plaintiff failed to meet her prima facie burden, we need not consider the sufficiency of the defendant’s opposition papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853 [1985]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of serious injury. Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Diliberto v. Barberich
94 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 792, 889 N.Y.2d 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/altamura-v-onebeacon-insurance-group-nyappdiv-2009.