Alston's Exr's v. Jones' Devisees

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Alston's Exr's v. Jones' Devisees

5 N.C. 45

DecidedJune 15, 1805

StatusPublished

This text of 5 N.C. 45 (Alston's Exr's v. Jones' Devisees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alston's Exr's v. Jones' Devisees, 5 N.C. 45 (N.C. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

We are of opinion that the deposition of Samuel Landrum was properly admitted in evidence upon the trial of the issue in the court below 5 and the Jury having found that the conveyance to Matthew Jones, was made to him as a purchaser for á valuable consideration, before the execution of the deed to Thomas Brooks, the decree of the court below must be confirmed and the bill be dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

We are of opinion that the deposition of Samuel Landrum was properly admitted in evidence upon the trial of the issue in the court below 5 and the Jury having found that the conveyance to Matthew Jones, was made to him as a purchaser for á valuable consideration, before the execution of the deed to Thomas Brooks, the decree of the court below must be confirmed and the bill be dismissed with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 N.C. 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alstons-exrs-v-jones-devisees-nc-1805.