Alston v. Winthrop University Police Department

431 F. App'x 226
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2011·No. No. 11-6101·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kendrick V. Alston appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and the court’s order denying discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alston v. Winthrop Univ. Police Dep’t, No. 8:09-cv-01130-RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 16, 2010); 2011 WL 127204 (Jan. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alston v. Winthrop University Police Department, 431 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2011).

431 F. App'x 226 (Alston v. Winthrop University Police Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related