Alston v. State
799 So. 2d 366, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15654, 2001 WL 1379284
This text of 799 So. 2d 366 (Alston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Alston v. State, 799 So. 2d 366, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15654, 2001 WL 1379284 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
We affirm the lower court’s order denying post-conviction relief. As in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), we certify that we have passed on the following question of great public importance:
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAS A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?
Affirmed; question certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Major v. State
790 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
799 So. 2d 366, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15654, 2001 WL 1379284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alston-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.