Alston v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Alston v. State

259 So. 2d 509

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 24, 1972

DocketNos. 71-66, 71-93

StatusPublished

This text of 259 So. 2d 509 (Alston v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Alston v. State, 259 So. 2d 509 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendants Alston and Bell after a jury verdict of guilty of the crime of robbery and an adjudication of guilt were sentenced respectively to periods of 15 years and 10 years of confinement at hard labor. The defendants’ appeals therefrom were consolidated and oral argument waived. We have examined defendants’ allegations of error, which are identical in both cases, reviewed the record and carefully considered all of defendants’ arguments and find them to be without merit. No reversible error having been made to appear the judgments are affirmed. See State v. Davis, Fla. 1971, 243 So.2d 587, and State v. Giesy, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 635; see also Hayden v. State, 1942, 150 Fla. 789, 9 So.2d 180.

REED, C. J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendants Alston and Bell after a jury verdict of guilty of the crime of robbery and an adjudication of guilt were sentenced respectively to periods of 15 years and 10 years of confinement at hard labor. The defendants’ appeals therefrom were consolidated and oral argument waived. We have examined defendants’ allegations of error, which are identical in both cases, reviewed the record and carefully considered all of defendants’ arguments and find them to be without merit. No reversible error having been made to appear the judgments are affirmed. See State v. Davis, Fla. 1971, 243 So.2d 587, and State v. Giesy, Fla.App.1971, 243 So.2d 635; see also Hayden v. State, 1942, 150 Fla. 789, 9 So.2d 180.

REED, C. J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 So. 2d 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alston-v-state-fladistctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack