Alston v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedMarch 7, 2025
Docket22-1494V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Alston v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Alston v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alston v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 22-1494V

SHIRLEY ALSTON as executrix of Chief Special Master Corcoran ESTATE OF CHARLES JEFFREY ALSTON, Filed: January 28, 2025 Petitioner, v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Jeffrey S. Pop, Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates, Beverly Hills, CA, for Petitioner.

Elizabeth Andary, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On October 11, 2022, Shirley Alston filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”) as the executrix of the estate of Charles Jeffrey Alston. On October 17, 2019, Mr. Alston received an influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which is a vaccine contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a). Petitioner alleges that Mr. Alston suffered from Guillain-Barré syndrome (“GBS”) and/or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (“CIDP”) as a result of the flu vaccine. She further alleges that the flu vaccine caused Mr. Alston’s alleged injury, and that he suffered the residual effects of his alleged injury for more than six months.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Respondent denies that Mr. Alston’s alleged GBS and/or CIDP or its residual effects were caused by the flu vaccine and denies that the flu vaccine caused Mr. Alston any other injury or his death.

Nevertheless, on January 27, 2025, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $45,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner as executrix of the estate of Charles Jeffrey Alston. Stipulation ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

SHIRLEY ALSTON, as Executrix of the Estate of CHARLES JEFFREY ALSTON,

Petitioner, No. 22-1494V Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran v. ECF

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

I. Shirley Alston ("petitioner"), as the Executrix of the Estate of Charles Jeffrey Alston

("Mr. Alston"), filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury

Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l Oto -34 (the "Vaccine Program"). The petition

seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to Mr. Alston's receipt of an influenza ("flu")

vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. § I00.3(a).

2. Mr. Alston received the flu vaccine on October 17, 2019.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that as a result ofreceiving the flu vaccine, Mr. Alston suffered

Guillain-Barre Syndrome ("GBS") and/or Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy

("CIDP"), and he experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six months.

Mr. Alston passed away on February 2, 2021. Petitioner does not allege that Mr. Alston's death

was sequela of his alleged vaccine-related injury. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on behalf of Mr. Alston as a result of the alleged condition.

6. Respondent denies that Mr. Alston's alleged GBS and/or CIDP or its residual effects

were caused by the flu vaccine and denies that the flu vaccine caused Mr. Alston any other injury

or his death.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry ofjudgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(I), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of$4S,OOO.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner as Executrix of the Estate of Charles Jeffrey Alston.

This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- l 5(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofjudgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l}, and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

I0. Petitioner and petitioner's attorney represent that compensation to be provided

pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not

primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l 5(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can

2 reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(I)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alston v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alston-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2025.