Alston v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedMay 23, 2024
Docket22-0790V
StatusPublished

This text of Alston v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Alston v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alston v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

************************* LEROY ALSTON, * No. 22-790V * Petitioner, * * Special Master Christian J. Moran v. * * Filed: April 30, 2024 SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * * Respondent. * *************************

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner; Naseem Kourosh, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1 On April 29, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Leroy Alston on July 21, 2022. Petitioner alleged that the influenza (“flu”) vaccine caused him to suffer from transverse myelitis (“TM”). Petitioner further alleges that his symptoms persisted for more than six months. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on his behalf as a result of his alleged injury.

Respondent denies that the vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from TM.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. Any changes will appear in the document posted on the website.

1 A lump sum of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment according to this decision and the attached stipulation. 2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.

2 IN THE UNITED ST ATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

LEROY ALSTON,

Petitioner, No. 22-790V (ECF) V. Special Master Moran

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Leroy Alston, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National

Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 et seq. (the "Vaccine Program").

The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt of a

influenza vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"),

42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received an influenza vaccine on October 14, 2021.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that petitioner suffered transverse myelitis as a result of the

influenza vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that petitioner experienced the residual effects of

this condition for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on petitioner' s behalf as a result of petitioner's alleged vaccine injury. 6. Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused any of petitioner's alleged

injuries or any other injury or petitioner's current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before

the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this

petition.

10. Petitioner and petitioner's attorney represent that compensation to be provided

pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not

primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l 5(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can

reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies,

Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act

(42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

2 11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 of this Stipulation and any amounts awarded

pursuant to paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-

15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award

for attorneys' fees and litigation costs, and past unreimbursable expenses, the money provided

pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for petitioner's benefit as contemplated by a strict

construction of 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l 5(a) and ( d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C.

§§ 300aa- l 5(g) and (h).

13. In return for the payments described in paragraphs 8 and 9, petitioner, in petitioner's

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Alston v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alston-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2024.