Alston v. Family Dollar Stores

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided January 30, 1995·No. I.C. No. 260339 233910·Published

Opinion

Counsel for plaintiff moves the Industrial Commission for a continuance in this matter due to the reason that both parties by letter dated 6 December 1994 to the Commission stipulated to a 30 day extension of time to file briefs. As a result of this extension of time, the plaintiff-appellee's brief will not be due until after the 3 March 1995 Full Commission hearing date. Defendants have no objection to a continuance.

Upon plaintiff's motion and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that counsel for plaintiff's motion for a CONTINUANCE is hereby GRANTED.

S/ ________________________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alston v. Family Dollar Stores, (N.C. Super. Ct. 1995).

Alston v. Family Dollar Stores (Alston v. Family Dollar Stores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.