Alston v. Dore

Fourth Circuit

Alston v. Dore

672 F. App'x 253

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2016·No. No. 16-1894·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Lee Alston appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alston v. Dore, No. 8:15-cv-02635-GJH (D. Md. Oct. 6, 2015, July 29, 2016). We deny Alston’s motion for stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Lee Alston appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alston v. Dore, No. 8:15-cv-02635-GJH (D. Md. Oct. 6, 2015, July 29, 2016). We deny Alston’s motion for stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Alston v. Dore, 672 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

672 F. App'x 253 (Alston v. Dore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related