Alston v. Astrue

474 F. App'x 390
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 23, 2012·No. No. 12-1363·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ella M. Alston appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice her employment discrimination claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Alston v. Astrue, No. 1:10-cv-03446-BEL, 2012 WL 665982 (D.Md. Feb. 28, 2012). We deny Alston’s motions for appointment of counsel and to supplement record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alston v. Astrue, 474 F. App'x 390 (4th Cir. 2012).

474 F. App'x 390 (Alston v. Astrue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related