Alston v. American Mortgage Co.

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 380
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Alston v. American Mortgage Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 Ohio St. 643
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1927·No. No. 20323·Published

Opinion

MARSHALL, C. J.

1. Where an Ohio corporation borrows money in an amount not in excess of the amount it is authorized to borrow by. Section 8705, General Code, and executes a note or bond therefor and secures its payment by a mortgage upon its property and such note or bond matures one year or more after the date thereof, and in such note or bond agrees to pay interest at a rate not in excess of that authorized by Section 8303, General Code, but includes in the principal sum agreed to be paid a sum in excess of the amount actually loaned, which excess, if repaid would constitute a greater charge for the use of the money than is authorized by Section 8303, General Code, such corporate borrower is precluded from making a defense of usury by virtue of the provisions of Section 8705, General Code, as amended August 14, 1921.

2. Such defense not being available to such corporate borrower, an assignee of such corporation for the benefit of creditors is likewise preeluded from making such defense.

Judgment affirmed.

Day, Allen, Kinkade, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alston v. American Mortgage Co., 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 380 (Ohio 1927).

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 380 (Alston v. American Mortgage Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.