Alster v. Bratton
225 A.D.2d 505, 639 N.Y.2d 692, 639 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3251
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 28, 1996
StatusPublished
This text of 225 A.D.2d 505 (Alster v. Bratton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Alster v. Bratton, 225 A.D.2d 505, 639 N.Y.2d 692, 639 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3251 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
Respondent’s determination that petitioner did not establish a special need to carry a concealed gun distinguishable from that of other persons engaged in the same profession is not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Tartaglia v Kelly, 215 AD2d 166). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Tartaglia v. Kelly
215 A.D.2d 166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 505, 639 N.Y.2d 692, 639 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alster-v-bratton-nyappdiv-1996.