Alster v. Bratton
225 A.D.2d 505, 639 N.Y.2d 692, 639 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3251
Opinion
Respondent’s determination that petitioner did not establish a special need to carry a concealed gun distinguishable from that of other persons engaged in the same profession is not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Tartaglia v Kelly, 215 AD2d 166). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Alster v. Bratton, 225 A.D.2d 505, 639 N.Y.2d 692, 639 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3251 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 505 (Alster v. Bratton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tartaglia v. Kelly
215 A.D.2d 166 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)