Alsop Holding Corp. v. Reisman
This text of 232 A.D. 840 (Alsop Holding Corp. v. Reisman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed • upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Under the facts and circumstances disclosed here, we think the cancellation of the Us pendens upon filing an undertaking for $80,000 was an improper exercise of discretion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alsop-holding-corp-v-reisman-nyappdiv-1931.